押题1 我们应该欢迎“宅”生活吗？题目要求The popularization of computer and Internet service has created a group of people called “indoorsy men” or “indoorsy women”. They prefer to spend most of their time at home rather than going outdoors and having face-to-face contact with others. Should people choose to become indoorsy? The following are opinions from both sides. Read carefully the opinions from both sides and write your response in about 200 words, in which you should first summarize briefly the opinions from both sides and give your views on the issue.Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.审题思路本题讨论“宅”生活是否可取。在具体行文方面，考生应首先简要概述正方观点：“宅”是现代的一种新型生活方式。然后概述反方观点：“宅”有种种弊端。接下来给出自己的观点：现代科技是把双刃剑，我们要把握好，适当利用可以使我们的生活更便利，但过度依赖则会对身体有害。最后总结全文，重申观点。高分范文Should We Embrace Indoorsy Lifestyle?With the globalization of modern technology, especially the world-wide access to Internet service, peoples lifestyle has been greatly influenced. Some enjoy indoorsy lifestyle. They hold that indoorsy lifestyle is time-saving and peaceful. In contrast, those against the idea claim that keep an indoorsy lifestyle will do harm to people both psychologically and physically.As far as I am concerned, modern technology is a double-edged sword. If we consider it as a useful tool to improve our life, it will certainly bring unprecedented convenience to us. With the assistance of the Internet, one can save his time through working, shopping, or communicating with others at home. Also, solitude isnt always equal to loneliness. Free from outside interruption, one can be creative and keep his mind sharp. On the other hand, too much reliance on or indulgence in the Internet will certainly have an impact on our normal life and work. For instance, indulging in social network online may corrode peoples social skills. To be specific, they may feel lost when talking with people face-to-face, which may affect their normal relationship with family members and friends. Whats worse, sitting in front of a computer all day long means little outdoor activities, which may damage ones health.In conclusion, while enjoying all the benefits the virtual world has brought to us, indoorsy people should also step out of their home and engage themselves in the real world.押题3让“公务员热”降温题目要求Every year millions of candidates attend the National Civil Servant Exam, some of whom even take it as their lifelong career to attend the exam every year in the hope of passing the exam and becoming a civil servant. The most sought-after position may attract nearly 10,000 applicants. The “craze for the Civil Servant Exam” has been fiercely debated in recent years. Should university graduates zealously pursue government posts? Read carefully the opinions from both sides and write your response in about 200 words, in which you should first summarize briefly the opinions from both sides and give your views on the issue.Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.审题思路本题讨论公务员考试热。在具体行文方面，考生可首先简要概述正方观点，即参加公务员考试是有益的；然后概述反方观点，即应当遏制公务员考试的热潮。然后给出自己的观点：不能盲目地参加考试，要结合自身情况，并重点阐述理由。最后总结全文。高分范文Curbing the Craze for Government PostsOur societyisexperiencingacraze forthe Civil Servant Exam in recent years, whichmakesbecoming a civil servanta popular mindset insociety. Two opposite voices emerge, providing different views on career planning.Some think the government post should be pursued, for it provides an appealing job with stability, fine income, secure welfare yet relatively moderate workload. Others are against the zealous pursuit of government posts because it is not as favorable as it was before.As far as I am concerned, university graduates should not pursue government posts zealously. Firstly, career planning should be based on ones ambition and specialty rather than some short-sighted interests like the stability of a job. Graduates are young; they are in a crucial period of striving for a better future. And the government also needsloyal and responsible employees instead of those who only seek for self-interests. Secondly, stable as it is, the government postlacks creativity and freshness. Besides,some positionshaveless mobility and prospect of promotion, and the salary is on the averagelevel, not so encouraging compared with that in some private sectors. Thirdly, theconception of equating a government post with success is apt to mislead graduates to choose government positionseven irrelevant to theirmajors, causing the waste of human resources.In conclusion, university graduates should pursue the