诺贝尔当初为何没设立数学奖（Why didnt Nobel set up a math prize）Of all the world-class scientific awards, the prestigious Nobel prize is undoubtedly the highest award. However, this honor for scientists is the highest reward, but did not set up a prize in mathematics. Nobel decided in his will award is awarded in physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine made the most important discovery of scientists; in addition, to write excellent literary works of the author and made outstanding contributions to the cause of world peace.Mathematics is a subject that studies such concepts as quantity, structure, change, and spatial model, and is the basis of natural sciences, such as physics and chemistry. Why wasnt such an important science included in the award by Nobel? It has been a mystery for many years.There have always been three explanations for the problem that beset many people.The first explanation is that foreign scholars believe that this may be related to the frustration of Nobels love. Nobel had a girlfriend 13 years younger than he was, Hess Sophie, a girl from Vienna, and later Nobel found out that she was very intimate with a mathematician and ran away with him.For his girlfriend and the mathematician elope, and Nobel has been greatly stimulated, brood on, he never talked about his life until the end, Nobel is still a bachelor. It may be the matter, and let Nobel at the end of the establishment of the Nobel prize specific award, without any effort to exclude mathematics.The second explanation is that some other western scholars believe that Nobel did not set up a mathematical prize because he hated a mathematician named Mi Taylor Fuller. Mi Taylor Fuller was an influential mathematician in Sweden in the late twentieth Century and early nineteenth Century. More than a century later, the AIKE tower mathematics journal, founded in 1882, is still the most authoritative journal of mathematics in the world today. He eventually became Dean of the Stockholm Institute (formerly the Stockholm University).It is said that Nobel and Mi Taylor Fuller are two people who cannot agree with each other. When Nobel decides to take out his own heritage and set up the Nobel prize, he suddenly thinks of Mi Taylor Fuller. If you set up a math prize, the first prize winner would be Mi Taylor Fuller. I can never award my hard work award to that guy. Nobel was so angry that he did not hit one place, so he removed the prize from the entire Nobel prize.The above two explanations, the first is only hearsay, the credibility is not high. The second one is not reasonable. Because even when the Nobel prize in the establishment of mathematics award, one of the most promising Mi Taylor Fuller is not winning, because he around some more mathematicians, such as Poe Kyle, Hilbert etc.The third explanation is that Nobel in nineteenth Century as a supremely gifted inventor, his invention to come more from the intuition and creativity, and do not need to use any higher mathematics knowledge, mathematical knowledge may not exceed four operations and proportion. At that time, in the second half of the nineteenth Century, the study of chemistry in general did not require advanced mathematics, and the application of mathematics in chemistry occurred after Nobels death. Nobel, I cant predict or imagine the huge role of mathematics plays in promoting scientific development, he believes that mathematics is not a human can directly benefit from the science, thus ignoring the establishment of the Nobel prize in mathematics is not difficult to understand. Another notable fact is that there was a very famous Scandinavian prize in the field of mathematics at that time. Since there was a prize, perhaps Nobel felt there was no need to set up a math prize at the Nobel prize.I think the third explanations are more reliable.Zhou Xiaochuan recently wrote in financial research that the high profits of Chinas banking sector were not caused by monopolies. He did not say anything but the monopoly. What could the bank do to make money?. He said that apart from the 5 major state-owned banks, China has many small and medium-sized banks, plus numerous urban and rural credit cooperatives, and thus concludes that there is no monopoly in Chinas banking sector.Zhou Xiaochuan defended the monopoly of the banking sector, suggesting that he might not know what a valid monopoly means, or that he, as a central bank governor, deliberately defended the interests of monopolies. If it is the previous explanation, it is the misfortune of the Chinese people; and if it is explained later, it is the great misfortune of the Chinese people. His view drove me to the point of being speechless. But I have no words, and I will explain why I do not speak. Thats why I wrote this blog, because Zhou Xiaochuan was so openly defending the banks monopoly profits that he lost the fairness and justice that the central bank governor should have. Even Zhou X