分类号 密级 中 国 地 质 大 学（北京）工程硕士学位论文地质勘查施工项目风险分级管理研 究 生： 张 扬 专 业： 安全工程 研究方向 安全管理工程 导 师 姓 名： 吕建国 职 称： 教授 企 业 导 师： 张晓东 职 称： 高级工程师 2014年5月A Dissertation Submitted toChina University of Geosciences for Master of Engineering DegreeManagement of construction project risk classification of geological explorationMaster Candidate: Zhang YangMajor: safty engineeringStudy Orientation:Dissertation Supervisor: Prof.Lv JianguoAssociate Supervisor:senior engin.Zhang XiaodongChina University of Geosciences (Beijing )声 明本人声明所呈交的论文是我个人在导师指导下进行的研究工作及取得的研究成果。尽我所知，除了文中特别加以标注和致谢的地方外，论文中不包含其他人已经发表或撰写过的研究成果，也不包含为获得中国地质大学或其它教育机构的学位或证书而使用过的材料。与我一同工作的同志对本研究所做的任何贡献均已在论文中作了明确的说明并表示了谢意。 签 名：日 期： 关于论文使用授权的说明本人完全了解中国地质大学有关保留、使用学位论文的规定，即：学校有权保留送交论文的复印件，允许论文被查阅和借阅；学校可以公布论文的全部或部分内容，可以采用影印、缩印或其他复制手段保存论文。公开 保密（_年） (保密的论文在解密后应遵守此规定)签 名： 导师签名： 日 期： 摘 要目前，我国正处在经济持续、健康、快速发展时期，对于矿产资源的需求量逐年加大，矿产勘查投人连创新高，勘查经费快速增长，加速增长的营业利润和健康发展的地矿经济将矿产市场和地勘工作带出低谷。作为基础产业和基础工作的地质勘察是国家建设经济、发展国防和基础建设不可或缺的。地质勘查施工是一个多工种、多工序互相协作配合的系统工程，勘查施工项目多在人烟稀少、高海拔、交通通信不便、地理和气象条件复杂的地区，具有作业分散、点多线长、高度流动的特点，安全管理难度大，加之多年来地勘单位对勘查施工项目始终采用较为单一的粗放型安全管理模式，施工过程中潜在的不安全因素较多，如不加强防范管控，随之而来的各类事故和伤害事件在损害职工生命安全的同时也会导致国家财产蒙受损失。为帮助地勘单位改进项目安全管理模式，实现风险分级管理，同时为提高安全管理效率提供科学的方法和手段，本文首先介绍了地质勘查项目施工的基本程序和分项工程，以事故致因理论为基础从人的不安全行为、物的不安全状态、不良的环境条件和管理缺陷四个方面对地质勘查施工项目存在的危险源进行了辨识分析，结合施工特点对地质勘查项目施工中的物体击打、车辆事故、机器伤害、起重损害、电击、溺亡、火患、高处掉落、中毒和窒息等9种事故的规律进行了研究，然后根据安全系统工程理论从人、技、物、环、管五个方面对地质勘查综合安全评价指标进行了提炼，确定了26个综合安全评价指标，利用层次分析法并通过专家咨询、收集资料和实际调研确定了各综合安全评价指标的权重，建立了安全风险评价模型，最后根据风险评价模型制订了地质勘查项目风险评分表，划分了安全风险等级，并结合工程实际应用评估结果从安全工程技术、安全教育和安全管理三个方面制订了对策措施。本文的研究成果对把握地质勘查安全事故规律，改进安全管理模式，提高安全管控质量，维护职工安全健康，帮助减少事故发生有着积极作用，为地质勘查综合安全分析和风险分级管理奠定了理论基础。关键词:地质勘查；危险源；风险评价；指标；分级；管理；对策ABSTRACTAt present, China is in a period of sustained, healthy and economic development rapidly, the demand for mineral resources is increasing year by year, mineral exploration investment hit record highs, exploration funds rapid growth, accelerate the growth of the business profits and healthy development of the mining economy will mineral market and geological prospecting work out of the doldrums. As the basic industry and basic work in geological survey is an integral part of national economic construction, the development of national defense and the infrastructure construction. Geological prospecting construction is a multi-disciplinary, multi process collaboration with system engineering, exploration and construction projects in the sparsely populated, high altitude, traffic inconvenience, geographical and meteorological conditions in complex area, the work is distributed, multi points and long distance, high mobility, security management difficult, combined with many years of geological prospecting units on the exploration construction project always uses extensive safety management mode, more potential unsafe factors in the process of construction, all kinds of accidents and injuries in the event that damage the lives and safety of workers will also lead to the loss of state property if not strengthen the prevention control.In order to help the geological prospecting units to improve project safety management mode, implement risk management, provide the scientific methods and means to improve the efficiency of security management, this paper firstly introduces the geological survey project construction of the basic procedures and sub project, the accident causing theory from four aspects of human unsafe behavior, physical environment conditions and management defects unsafe state, poor exploration risk source construction project for the existence of identification analysis of geology, combined with the construction characteristics of geological exploration project in the construction of objects striking, vehicle accidents, injuries, lifting machine damage, shock, drowning, fire, high fall, poisoning and asphyxia of 9 accidents the rules were studied, then from the people, technology, material, ring, pipe index of comprehensive safety evaluation was refined on geological exploration in five aspects according to the theory of safety system engineering, the 26 comprehensive safety evaluation index, using the analytic hierarchy process and the expert consultation, collecting data and practical investigation to determine the weight of each index comprehensive safety evaluation, established a security risk evaluation model, finally according to the risk assessment model for geological exploration project wind risk score table, dividing the security level of risk, and combining with the practical engineering application of evaluation from three aspects of safety engineering technology, safety education and safety management measures.The results