1What is the origin of works of artReposted elsewhere in the paper for free download .com(B) Heidegger in the art of reality on the “people” issues on the “brackets” and brought about another bad consequence of this is to interpersonal relations (social relations) is also placed in the “brackets” and a. If we say 2that he was in “Being and Time” to “fundamental ontology” exposition is also “this in the” a “Living” (In-der-Welt-sein) as “the basic mechanisms of this in” (see “ Being and Time “, Chan Ka Ying, Wang festival translation, Joint Publishing, 1987, p. 65 ff.), then in the” art of the origin “, the” alive “as embodied in the interpersonal relationship will completely disappear , and only the lonely work of art (it is a lonely artists “creative products”) and “Earth” and “world” relationship. In this regard, he accepted (before Marx) on the works and the traditional “material” relationship of the idea that the self-evident, “work is the nature of existing things”, namely, “objects”, the problem lies in “Art work much more than material factors, it is some kind of something else “(p. 3), and must be those” material factors “as this” something else “and” metaphor “and” symbol (symbol) “( p. 4). So, what is his works to express the “something else” mean? 3Heidegger through Van Goghs an “agricultural shoes” of the painting shows that this “something else”, this “extraordinary things”, “so surprised thinking” thing, that is, objects or apparatus, “ exist “is its” truth “(p. 19). We have seen Van Goghs agricultural shoes is “walking the hard labor”, “echoed the call of the silent earth,” “gift”, “dormant”, “imbued with the stability of bread by nature Ai no grudges, anxiety, and then defeated the wordless joy of poverty implies a shiver when the birth pangs of death approaching the time of Half-Life “(p. 17), in a word, from the objects or apparatus that is described in people things poetic associations. That is to say, a work of art (broadly defined “Poem”), is expressed in “Poem.” This is not nothing new insights. Not Heidegger reminded, we already knew that. What is new is that he put such a poetic as “apparatus of apparatus exist”, is the apparatus of the root causes of the Earth “to encapsulate” and “intact.” The so-called “intact” or “save”, of course, for the person or subject of misunderstanding, disruption and customary in terms of vision, the people must exclude these subjective Chen See, for material that is the object to take “Gelassenheit” objective attitude, in order to let the 4“truth” “close to us” (p. 23). Can be seen that Heidegger is still in the subject and object, and the relative relationship between the object to look at the nature of the work of art: the art of the “reflected” nothing more than be viewed as an object that “existence” of the “truth”; but this object is said to be not true and the main opposition, but prior to the main object of the common causes of undifferentiated (similar to Schellings “absolute”) Bale. This does not advance from the traditional point of view of how much. However, Kant already pointed out, a lonely man on a desert island will not have any interest in decoration and art, and only in the community that he would put his feelings in order to convey to others in need art (see “Critique of Judgment” No. 41.); Hegel in his “aesthetic” is everywhere in the focus on social relations among human beings, he believes that “each work of art are also everyone in the audience of the dialogue” ( “Aesthetics “I, Zhu Guangqian translation, Commercial Press, 1979, p. 335.). In their view, art is by no means to leave the relationship between human kind of “truth” of the “Generate” or “into art.” 5Now take a look at Marxs view on this issue. First thing to note is that Marxs philosophical revolution in general is from the “objects” as “relationship” began. Marx said: “Those who have some relationship exists where the relationship is for me to exist. Animals, not what happened relations, but there is no relationship; for the animals, its otherness of the relationship is not a relationship exists. Thus, the sense of a beginning, a product of society, but as long as people exist, it is still such a product “(“ German Ideology “,” Collected Works of Marx and Engels, “Vol 3, No. 34 page.). Engels, “Karl Marxs” Critique of Political Economy “,” said: “The study of economics is not material, but the relationship between people,” “But these relationships are always with the same material, and as a things appear “(Marx:” “Critique of Political Economy” Preamble Introduction “, Peoples Publishing House 1971, p. 43.). Not only in economics but also in general science, art, etc., as well. As Marx said: “Even when I was a science-like activities, that is, when I was kind of just in a few cases, to be 6directly in joint activities with others, I also engaged in social activities, and because I activity as a person “(“ Economics in 1844 - a