（英语）高考英语阅读理解( 科普环保 ) 基础练习题含解析一、高中英语阅读理解科普环保类1犇犇阅读下列短文，从每题所给的A、B、 C 和 D 四个选项中，选出最佳选项。After a morning hike in the Saneum HealingForest, 46-year-old firefighter Kang Byoung-wook has tea made from the bark of an elm tree, practices yoga ( 瑜伽 ), and makes a picture with dried flowers. He is one of 40 firefighters taking part in a three-day program, the aim of which is tooffer forest healing (森林治愈 ); the firefighters all have posttraumatic stress disorder (创伤后应激障碍).Saneum is one of three official healing forests in South Korea. Soon there will be 34 more. South Koreans-many of whom suffer from work stress, digital addiction, and great academic pressure have accepted the medicalization of nature with great enthusiasm.There is increasing evidence that being outside in a pleasant natural environment is good for us. But how many of us get to enjoy nature regularly? Fewer and fewer, it seems. According to Lisa Nisbet, a psychology professor at Canada s Trent University, evidence for the benefits of nature is pouring in at a time when we are most disconnected from it.We dont think of being outdoors as a way to increase happiness, says Nisbet. We think other things will, like shopping or TV. But South Korea is starting to challenge this opinion.So what are some of the benefits of nature that Nisbet refers to? Being surrounded by nature has one obvious effect: It calms us and reduces our stress levels. This has been shown to lower blood pressure and heart rates.Another experiment conducted by psychologist Stephen Kaplan found that people who took a50-minute walk in a park had better attention and short-term memory than those who took a walk along a city street.Perhaps whats more surprising is that nature may also make us more creative. David Strayer, a psychologist at the University of Utah, showed as much with a group of participants, who performed 50 percent better on creative problem-solving tasks after three days of wilderness backpacking.In fact, we may never know exactly what nature does to the brain. Something mysterious will always remain, and maybe thats as it should be.（ 1） What is Kang Byoung-wook doing?（ 2） What does Lisa Nisbet think of being outdoors?A.It is overlooked by people.B.It has nothing to do with happiness.C.South Koreans show great interest in it.D.We need more evidence for its benefits.（3） What benefit of nature did Stephen Kaplan find?A.It affects peoples feelings.B.It lowers the risks of diseases.C.It helps improve mental performance.D.It does more good than physical exercise.（ 4） What would be the best title for the text?A.Your life in forestsB.Your brain on natureC.The future of forest healingD.The benefits of a stress-free life【答案】 （ 1） A（ 2） A（ 3） C（ 4） B【解析】 【分析】本文是一篇说明文，由韩国患创伤后应激障碍的消防员接受森林治愈谈起，介绍了大自然对我们身心健康的益处。（ 1）考查细节理解。根据第一段中的 “ Kang Byoung-wook has tea made from the bark of an elm tree, practices yoga (瑜伽 ), and makes a picture with dried flowers. 可”知， Kang Byoung-wook 正在接受森林治愈：品茶、做瑜伽、做手工。他完全沉浸在大自然之中。故选A。（ 2）考查推理判断。根据第三段中的“But how many of us get to enjoy nature regularly?Fewer and fewer 和 evidence for the benefits of nature is pouring in at a time when we are most disconnected from it 以”及第四段中 Lisa Nisbet 所说的话可知，他认为现代人忽视了大自然的重要性，户外活动少了。故选A。（ 3）考查细节理解。根据倒数第三段中的“ had better attention and short -term memory”可知， Stephen Kaplan 的研究发现亲近大自然可以提高注意力和短期记忆力，也就是说提高了大脑的工作效率。故选 C。（ 4）考查主旨大意。本文主要介绍了森林治愈和大自然对于人类健康尤其是大脑工作效率和减缓压力方面的益处，故B 项作标题最符合文章的主旨。故选B。【点评】本题考点涉及细节理解，推理判断和主旨大意三个题型的考查，是一篇健康类阅读，要求考生在捕捉细节信息的基础上，进一步根据上下文的逻辑关系，进行分析，推理，概括和归纳，从而选出正确答案。2犇犇阅读下面文章，然后从题中所给的A、 B、 C、D 四个选项中，选出每个问题的最佳选项。My two- and four-year-old boys love to win, whether theyre racing their bikes down the sidewalk or just finishing their snacks. Its true that those with high status, from world leadersand prize winners to athletes and movie stars, are people we like and respect. A recent study published in Nature Human Behaviour showed that we seem to have an innate (天生的 ) preference for high-ranking peoples but only if those people arent hurtful toward others.Researchers showed toddlers (aged 21 to 31 months) a scene where two puppets (木偶 ) approached one another from opposite sides of a stage and one bowed to let the other pass first.Asked which puppet they liked better, 18 of the 21 toddlers in the experiment reached for the puppet who had been allowed to pass. Because respect from others is a marker of status, this suggests that children have a preference for those with a higher status even before age three.However, the results were quite different when two puppets approached one another and one used force to knock the other down before continuing to the other side. In this case, 18 of the 21 toddlers reached for the one who was k