1Acupoint applicator iontophoresis treatment of chronic superficial gastritis with depression syndrome syndrome EfficacyAbstract Objective To Sticking acupoint iontophoresis treatment efficacy of chronic superficial gastritis with depression syndrome and its general treatment efficacy comparison method 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups, 30 cases in each treatment group Conventional protect gastric mucosa, promote gastrointestinal motility based on to adopt the ZW-3B domestic advanced computer IF treatment instrument plus compound Chinese medicine preparation iontophoresis. The prescription: safflower 30g, red peony root 30g, Bupleurum 30g Chuanxiong 30g, Atractylodes 30g. Various drugs cold water immersion 2h, the text gently 1h, gauze filter to take liquid 500ml medicine pad soaked in liquid placed in the role of electrode Zhongwan, Qu pool liner, with gauze fixed Zusanli acupoints IF treatments twice a day, every 20min, the course of treatment, such as former control group to protect the gastric mucosa, prokinetic and oral medicine 2conventional treatment results in overall efficacy and individual symptoms efficacy treatment group than the control group. applicator Conclusion acupoint iontophoresis application of the acupuncture points is reliable for chronic superficial gastritis. Chronic superficial gastritis words; depression syndrome; Acupoint Application; iontophoresis The clinical chronic superficial gastritis accompanied by depression syndrome patients are common, chronic superficial gastritis associated with depression syndrome in clinical research has a very real clinical significance. Of 60 patients diagnosed with chronic superficial gastritis and accompanied by depression syndrome patients for treatment, are summarized below. 1 Materials and Methods 1.1 General Information 60 cases diagnosed as chronic superficial gastritis accompanied by depression syndrome patients were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group. Treatment group of 30 patients, 9 males and 21 females; aged 29 to 65 years old, with an average (45.65 + - 12.61) years old; daily for 8 to 30 days, an average of 320 days in the control group 30 cases, male 11 cases, 19 females; aged 29 to 64 years old, on average (46.65 + -13.65); treatment 7 to 32 days, an average of 21 day two groups of gender, age, illness severity, were statistically, the difference was not significant sex (P 0.05), comparable. 1.2 Methods Treatment group using the ZW-3B domestic advanced computer IF treatment instrument plus compound Chinese medicine preparation iontophoresis. Prescription: Citrus aurantium 30g, white peony root 30g, Bupleurum 30g Chuanxiong 30g, Atractylodes 30g. Various drugs cold water immersion 2h slow fire fried 1h, gauze filter to take liquid 500ml pad soaked in liquid placed on the role of electrode pads, gauze fixed Zhongwan, Qu pool, Zusanli acupoints IF treatments, day 1, every 20min. addition to acid suppression to protect the gastric mucosa, promote gastrointestinal motility conventional treatment control group to acid suppression to protect the gastric mucosa, promote gastrointestinal motility conventional treatment syndrome integral changes in the two groups were 4compared before and after treatment, Integral assessment reference Traditional Chinese Medicine Research in November 1989 developed digestive disease professional committees 1. 2 Efficacy (1) chronic superficial gastritis with TCM syndromes of depression syndrome in patients with both heart and spleen disharmony of liver and each accounted for 41.67%, 38.33% (2) in the treatment group and the control group on each single symptom integral comparison: before treatment, between the two groups compare differences without significantly with sex (P 0.05) compared before and after treatment, differences have very significantly with sex (P 0.01); compared the control group before and after treatment, differences there are very significant with (P 0.01), indicating that the two groups had very significant effect on the improvement of individual symptoms. symptom scores between the two groups after treatment, the difference was significant (P 0.05) between the two groups. Treatment group before and after treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05); compare before and after the treatment of the control group, the difference was significant (P 0.05). Illustrate the two groups to improve the symptoms of depression syndrome have significant effect. Groups after treatment between symptom s