复习题（2）1、 试分别判断下列图中G1和G2是否互模拟(bisimulation)，并说明理由:a a ab c cbG1= G2=a bca bc cG1 G2dd d答案：(1) 在图中标出各点的状态，我们构造关系，可知 G2 可以模拟 G1，下面我们讨论是否可模拟，在 G2 中 有一个 a 变换可对应到 G1 中 2 个变换，即 ，。但 有两个变换 b，c，而在 G1 中仅存在只有 b 或只有 c 的状态点，可知 G1 和 G2 不能互模拟。(2) 如图，标出各状态点，构造有关系可知其中 G1 中的点均可由 G2 中的点模拟，下面我们考虑可知同样其中 G2 中的点均可由 G1 中的点模拟. 所以 G1 和 G2 为互模拟的。2、 给定如下数据图(Data Graph) ： r1c1 c2s2s3 s6s7s10company companynameadres nameurladres“Widget”“Trento” “Gadget”“w.gp.fr”“Paris”p2p1 p3s0s1 s4s5 8s9person erson person“Smith”namepositn namephoe nameositn“Manger” “Jones”“521” “Dupont”“Sale”eploymagsceowrks-frwk-fr wrks-forc试给出其 Strong DataGuide 图答案：r1p1,p2,p3 c1,c2s0,s4,s8 s1,s9 s5 s2,s6 s3,s7 s10p2p1,p3personname positionphone name address urlceoemployeemanagesworks-forStrong DataGuide 图3、 Consider the relation, r , shown in Figure 5.27. Give the result of the following query :Figure 5.27Query 1:select building, room number, time_slo_ id, count(*)from rgroup by rollup (building, room number, time_slo_ id)Query 1:select building, room number, time_slo_ id, count(*)from rgroup by cube (building, room number, time_slo_ id)答案：Query 1返回结果集：为以下四种分组统计结果集的并集且未去掉重复数据。building room number time_slo_ id count(*)产生的分组种数：4 种；第一种：group by A,B,CGarfield 359 A 1Garfield 359 B 1Saucon 651 A 1Saucon 550 C 1Painter 705 D 1Painter 403 D 1第二种：group by A,BGarfield 359 A 2Garfield 359 B 2Saucon 651 A 1Saucon 550 C 1Painter 705 D 1Painter 403 D 1第三种：group by AGarfield 359 A 2Garfield 359 B 2Saucon 651 A 2Saucon 550 C 2Painter 705 D 2Painter 403 D 2第四种：group by NULL。本没有 group by NULL 的写法，在这里指是为了方便说明，而采用之。含义是：没有分组，也就是所有数据做一个统计。例如聚合函数是 SUM 的话，那就是对所有满足条件的数据进行求和。Garfield 359 A 6Garfield 359 B 6Saucon 651 A 6Saucon 550 C 6Painter 705 D 6Painter 403 D 6Query 2:group by 后带 rollup 子句与 group by 后带 cube 子句的唯一区别就是：带 cube 子句的 group by 会产生更多的分组统计数据。 cube 后的列有多少种组合（注意组合是与顺序无关的）就会有多少种分组。返回结果集：为以下八种分组统计结果集的并集且未去掉重复数据。building room number time_slo_ id count(*)产生的分组种数：8 种第一种：group by A,B,CGarfield 359 A 1Garfield 359 B 1Saucon 651 A 1Saucon 550 C 1Painter 705 D 1Painter 403 D 1第二种：group by A,BGarfield 359 A 2Garfield 359 B 2Saucon 651 A 1Saucon 550 C 1Painter 705 D 1Painter 403 D 1第三种：group by A,CGarfield 359 A 1Garfield 359 B 1Saucon 651 A 1Saucon 550 C 1Painter 705 D 2Painter 403 D 2第四种：group by B,CGarfield 359 A 2Garfield 359 B 2Saucon 651 A 1Saucon 550 C 1Painter 705 D 1Painter 403 D 1第五种：group by AGarfield 359 A 2Garfield 359 B 2Saucon 651 A 2Saucon 550 C 2Painter 705 D 2Painter 403 D 2第六种：group by BGarfield 359 A 2Garfield 359 B 2Saucon 651 A 1Saucon 550 C 1Painter 705 D 1Painter 403 D 1第七种：group by CGarfield 359 A 2Garfield 359 B 1Saucon 651 A 2Saucon 550 C 1Painter 705 D 2Painter 403 D 2第八种：group by NULLGarfield 359 A 6Garfield 359 B 6Saucon 651 A 6Saucon 550 C 6Painter 705 D 6Painter 403 D 64、 Disks and Access TimeConsider a disk with a sector扇区 size of 512 bytes, 63 sectors per track磁道, 16,383 tracks per surface盘面, 8 double-sided platters柱面 (i.e., 16 surfaces). The disk platters rotate at 7,200 rpm (revolutions per minute).The average seek time is 9 msec, whereas the track-to-track seek time is 1 msec.Suppose that a page size of 4096 bytes is chosen. Suppose that a file containing 1,000,000 records of 256 bytes each is to be stored on such a disk. No record is allowed to span two pages (use these numbers in appropriate places in your calculation).(a) What is the capacity of the disk?(b) If the file is arranged sequentially on the disk, how many cylinders are needed?(c) How much time is required to read this file sequentially?(d) How much time is needed to read 10% of the pages in the file randomly?Answer:(a) Capacity = sector size * num. of sectors per track * num. of tracks per surface * num of surfaces = 512 * 63 * 16383 * 16 = 8 455 200 768(b) File: 1,000,000 records of 256 bytes eachNum of records per page: 4096/256 = 161,000,000/ 16 = 62,500 pages or 62,500 * 8 = 500,000 sectorsEach cylinder has 63 * 16 = 1,008 sectorsSo we need 496.031746 cylinders.(c) We analyze the cost using the following three components:Seek time: This access seeks the initial position of the file (whose cost can be approximated using the average seek time) and then seeks between adjacent tracks 496 times (whose cost is the track-to-track seek time). So the seek time is 0.009 + 496*0.001 = 0.505 seconds.Rotational delay: The transfer time of one track of data is 1/ (7200/60) = 0.0083 seconds.For this question, we use 0.0083/2 as an estimate of the rotational delay (other numbers between 0 and 0.00415 are also fine). So the rotational delay for 497 seeks is 0.00415 * 497 = 2.06255.Transfer time: It takes 0.0083*(500000/63) = 65.8730159 seconds to transfer data in 500,000 sectors.Therefore, total access time is 0.505 + 2.06255 + 65.8730159 = 68.4405659 seconds.(d) number of pages = 6250time cost per page: 0.009 (seek) + 0.0083/2 (rotational delay) + 0.0083*8/63 (transfer) = 0.0142 secondstotal cost = 6250 * 0.0142 = 88.77 seconds5、 Disk Page Layout The figure b