www.lxws.net meeloun论文网 专业留学生论文作业代写网站留学论文写作女性在议会中的表现Female representation in parliament and the Conservative Party and how they engage with womens issues.Through a recent gendered analysis of the Conservative Party, it has come to fruition that women are still being underrepresented in politics and womens issues are not being heard. Such research has demonstrated that this may be due to the selection process being biased and political office remaining a masculine field. Women are still representing fewer than one in five MPs in the UK (Russell et al, 2000 :17) and make up just 21.8% of the worlds parliamentarians (Forke & Rickne, 2016). The female absence from politics has suggested that society might be getting its leaders from an excessively narrow area of human talent and that female preferences are underrepresented in political judgments (Murray, 2014). Due to this lack of female representation, a number issues such as childcare, womens pensions and care of the elderly are not being properly addressed.At present, there is a distinct limit in the amount of of research conducted into gender in the conservative party and the House of Commons but a fair portion of the preexisting literature surrounding it all points to gendered inequalities based on old forms of gender norms in parliament. In the following research report I will explain why females are so under represented in parliament and the gender inequality that comes with it as well as explaining what effects the male built establishment in the party has on governmental policies such as childcare.MethodologyThis analysis uses secondary data that has been collected from the UK data service. The data was originally used by Paul Webb and Sarah Childs (See Webb & Childs, 2009) for an extensive gendered analysis of the contemporary UK Conservative Party (Webb & Childs, 2009). The data was collected over the duration of three years in order to assess how far the Conservative Party was assimilating women and their concerns and if womens issues were being taken seriously (Webb & Childs, 2009). The full dataset consists of 27 face to- face semi-structured interviews with Conservative Peers and 19 Conservative MPs. Focus groups were also conducted with 7 groups of floating and unbiased individuals and then six groups of party members.Through the analysis of secondary data I will be assessing the accounts given by several members and nonmembers of the parliamentary group through the dissection of qualitative interviews of two male and female Conservative peers and two male and female Conservative MPs. Qualitative interviews are particularly useful as a form of research because they access individuals attitudes and values- things that cannot necessarily be observed in a formal questionnaire (Silverman, 2004, 182). In using 4 female and 4 male interview transcripts I was able to access the difference of opinion of why they believe females are being under represented in the Conservative party and the House of Commons and how they think womens issues could be better dealt with.I also analysed four focus groups, two of which are Conservative Party sympathisers and two of which are groups of party members. Focus groups are particularly useful as a form of secondary research because in focus groups participants are able to bring to the fore issues in relation to a topic that they deem to be important and significant because the moderator has to relinquish a certain amount of control to the participants, the issues that concern them can surface (Bryman, 2012, 338). I have used focus group data because the data that occurs from the participants interacting with one another can be useful in determining the specific issues related to the topic in question (Bryman, 2012).However, there are certain limitations to this type of research, focus groups produce an extensive amount of data, which can sometimes be difficult to analyse on top of being excessively time consuming. Therefore, developing a strategy to analyse the data which incorporated both what people say and their pattern of interaction can prove to be quite problematic (Bryman, 2012). Another limitation of focus groups is that sometimes the poor quality of recordings causes them to become inaudible, which affects the transcription and therefore subsequently the data produced, rendering it unreliable (Bryman, 2012). There are also certain limitations to qualitative interviews as interviews do not tell us directly about peoples experiences and few researchers believe that in the course of the interview, you are able to get into someones head (Silverman, 2015, 83).The following report uses thematic analysis from the study of qualitative interviews and focus groups and explores the under representation of women in the Conservative Party and political office, with reference to gender equality in the conservative party and also seeks to explain why womens