细节理解题增分点(二)概括细节理解题典例(2018全国卷阅读C节选).Wang collected more than 7 million abandoned bricks of different ages.He asked the workers to use traditional techniques to make the bricks into walls, roofs and corridors.This creation attracted a lot of attention thanks to its mixture of modern and traditional Chinese elements (元素)Wangs works show a deep understanding of modern architecture and a good knowledge of traditions.Through such a balance, he had created a new type of Chinese architecture, said Tadao Ando, the winner of the 1995 Pritzker Prize.30What made Wangs architectural design a success?AThe mixture of different shapes.BThe balance of East and West.CThe use of popular techniques.DThe harmony of old and new.解析选D根据选段第一段第三句“This creation attracted a lot of attention thanks to its mixture of modern and traditional Chinese elements (元素)”和选段第二段第二句中的“Through such a balance, he had created a new type of Chinese architecture”可知，传统与现代元素的和谐共存是王澍建筑设计成功的秘诀，故选D。干扰项分析A项错在shapes，不是形状的混合，是现代和传统中国元素的混合；B项错在East and West，是modern architecture和a good knowledge of traditions的平衡；C项错在popular，根据选文第一段第二句可知应是traditional。增分技巧概括细节理解题要求通过思维分析将原文中比较分散或复杂的信息进行归纳概括，即要“综合事实定答案”。容易做错的原因是没有全面分析所涉及的相关信息，只是单一地、孤立地分析某句内容从而不能做出符合题干条件的选择。(1)通过关键词定区间。就是说我们在阅读题干的时候迅速把题干中的关键词标记出来，然后根据关键词回到原文当中定位相关的段落、语句。(2)通过概括定选项。概括细节理解题可能涉及文章某一段或几段，甚至贯穿全文的各个位置，需要考生寻找文章中的多个细节。然后尝试用自己的语言去归纳文中的信息或事实，然后再看选项，挑选出和自己所归纳的信息最接近的选项作为正确答案。(3)兼用排除法解题。在遇到模棱两可、难以做出选择的答案时，也可采用排除法，将“无此细节”和“与此细节相反”的选项排除。训练目标(一) 对点练攻克失分短板A(2018北京高考阅读C节选)PlasticEating WormsHumans produce more than 300 million tons of plastic every year.Almost half of that winds up in landfills (垃圾填埋场), and up to 12 million tons pollute the oceans.So far there is no effective way to get rid of it, but a new study suggests an answer may lie in the stomachs of some hungry worms.Researchers in Spain and England recently found that the worms of the greater wax moth can break down polyethylene, which accounts for 40% of plastics.The team left 100 wax worms on a commercial polyethylene shopping bag for 12 hours, and the worms consumed and broke down about 92 milligrams, or almost 3% of it.To confirm that the worms chewing alone was not responsible for the polyethylene breakdown, the researchers made some worms into paste (糊状物) and applied it to plastic films.14 hours later the films had lost 13% of their mass apparently broken down by enzymes (酶) from the worms stomachs.Their findings were published in Current Biology in 2017.43What can we learn about the worms in the study?AThey take plastics as their everyday food.BThey are newly evolved creatures.CThey can consume plastics.DThey wind up in landfills.解析：选C根据第一段中的“a new study suggests an answer may lie in the stomachs of some hungry worms”以及第二段中的“Researchers in Spain and England recently found that the worms of the greater wax moth can break down polyethylene .and the worms consumed and broke down about 92 milligrams, or almost 3% of it.”概括可知大蜡螟幼虫能吃塑料，故选C。B(2018浙江高考阅读B节选)Steven Stein likes to follow garbage trucks.His strange habit makes sense when you consider that hes an environmental scientist who studies how to reduce litter, including things that fall off garbage trucks as they drive down the road.What is even more interesting is that one of Steins jobs is defending an industry behind the plastic shopping bag.Americans use more than 100 billion thin film plastic bags every year.So many end up in tree branches or along highways that a growing number of cities do not allow them at checkouts (收银台)The bags are prohibited in some 90 cities in California，including Los Angeles.Eyeing these headwinds, plastic-bag makers are hiring scientists like Stein to make the case that their products are not as bad for the planet as most people assume.24What has Steven Stein been hired to do?AHelp increase grocery sales.BRecycle the waste material.CStop things falling off trucks.DArgue for the use of plastic bags.解析：选D根据第一段中的“is defending an industry”和第二段中的“are hiring scientists like Stein to make the case that their products are not as bad for the planet as most people assume”概括可知塑料袋生产商雇用Steven Stein是为了说明他们的产品并不像大多数人认为的那样对地球有害。故选D。C(2017北京高考阅读A节选).Amazingly, Taylor had just taken a CPR course the day before.Still, she hesitated.She didnt think she knew it well enough.But when no one else came forward, Taylor ran to Paris and began doing CPR. “It was scary. I knew it was the difference between life and death，” says Taylor.Taylors swift action helped her teammates calm down.One girl called 911. Two more ran to get the school nurse, who brought a defibrillator, an electronic device (器械) that can shock the heart back into work.Luck stayed with them: Pariss heartbeat returned.Experts say Paris is right: For a sudden heart failure, the single best chance for survival is having someone nearby step in and do CPR quickly.