2020GRE写作如何正确表达论述观点GRE写作的题材要求为议论文，而有许多议论文中常见的表达方法可能大家并不知道如何准确地道地用英文表达出来。下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作如何正确表达论述观点,希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧!GRE写作如何正确表达论述观点新GRE写作表达技巧1counterproductive adj.产生相反效果(结果)的e.g. It is counterproductive to be too tough: it just makes the staff resentful.e.g. Although the speaker overlooks certain circumstances in which undueskepticism might be counterproductive, and even harmful, on balance I agree thatwe should not passively accept whatever is passed off as fact; otherwise, human knowledge would never advance.新GRE写作表达技巧2seminal adj.萌芽的，潜在的;开创性的;有重大影响的e.g. in the seminal state (在萌芽状态) seminal thoughts / seminal principle(基本原则)e.g. a seminal book/poet / This experiment was to have a seminal influence on his own political development.新GRE写作表达技巧3forgo v.放弃 (The choice to forgo his security is always available, although it might carry unpleasant consequence)新GRE写作表达技巧4intuition n.直觉 (I will trust my strong intuition that free will is an essential part of our being as humans.)新GRE写作表达技巧5satisfy v.证明是正当的，公证的;为寻找正当理由e.g. Such action can be justified on the grounds of greater efficiency.e.g. In the final analysis, government cannot philosophically justify assisting large cities for the purpose of either promoting or preserving the nation s cultural traditions; nor is government assistance necessary toward these ends.新GRE写作表达技巧6resort to 诉诸e.g. no necessity to resort to violent actions such as demonstration, riot or rebel.新GRE写作表达技巧7hinge on 以为转移，靠转动e.g. The claim that societys destiny hinges on how children are socialized, while appealing in some respects, is an over-statement at best.新GRE写作表达技巧8at best 最多，充其量;以最乐观的观点来看新GRE写作表达技巧9collaborate to e.g. For example, scientists, researchers, and even computer programmers must collaborate to establish common goals, coordinate efforts, and meet time lines.新GRE写作表达技巧10lend some credence to 提供支持e.g. While our everyday experience might lend credence to this assertion.e.g. Recent advances in molecular biology and genetics lend some credence to this position, by suggesting that these determining physical forces include our own inpidual genetic makeup.GRE满分作文重点解析：Critical ThinkingToo much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I dont think so. To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think most people would reject that.Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a lifewithout antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.Technology is the thing that will allow people t