资源预览内容
第1页 / 共57页
第2页 / 共57页
第3页 / 共57页
第4页 / 共57页
第5页 / 共57页
第6页 / 共57页
第7页 / 共57页
第8页 / 共57页
第9页 / 共57页
第10页 / 共57页
亲,该文档总共57页,到这儿已超出免费预览范围,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述
2022年河南省周口市大学英语6级大学英语六级模拟考试(含答案)学校:_ 班级:_ 姓名:_ 考号:_一、2.Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning)(20题)1.Nanotechnology is the study and manipulation of the very small matters such as atoms, molecules and viruses.A.Y B.N C.NG2.According to Rubin, Auto-Tune may have a _ effect on singers.A.minor B.major C.positive D.negative3. Which of the following graph most accurately describes Canadian cod catches from 1950 to 1992 _.A.B.C.D.4.The piston of a natural-gas vehicle moves up and down by the power of _.A.the spark plugB.the four-stroke engineC.the air in the cylinderD.the heat of natural-gas burning5.To make sure that we live now on 80% of our income and invest the other 20%, the author suggests applying to the bank for _ .6.Economizing of the PoorComprehending Economizing of the PoorWalking down the aisles of a supermarket, low-income shoppers must consider a number of factors including quantity, price, quality and nutritional differences when selecting food products. Food-purchase decisions by the poor often entail balances among taste, preference and quality factors-either real or perceived-to meet spending constraints. Within broad product categories such as cereal, cheese, meat and poultry, and fruits and vegetables, shoppers can choose among many substitutable products. Low-income shoppers can extend their food dollars in a number of ways. They may shop in discount food stores; they may purchase and consume less food than higher-income shoppers; they may purchase low-priced (and possibly lower quality) food products; or they may rely on some combination of all three. A better understanding of how the poor economize in food spending addresses important policy questions raised by researchers, nutrition educators, and food-assistance program managers.The Correlation between the Location and PriceWhether the poor face significantly different food prices due to where they shop for food remains an unresolved empirical question. Extensive research over the years has tried to answer the question-Do the poor pay less for food? The Economic Research Service (ERS) in 1997 received the results of studies comparing price differences in grocery stores across different income levels and combined these with current census data on the distribution of low-income households by urbanization type. The ERS study concluded that, in general, the poor face higher prices due to their greater representation in urban and rural areas (as opposed to suburban areas), where food prices tend to be higher.Higher Prices but Less SpendingBased on results from household surveys, ERS also found that despite facing higher prices, low-income shoppers spend less than higher-income shoppers for food purchased in food stores. Due to their level of aggregation and lack of in-store sales and promotion information, such surveys shed little light on the economizing practices of households. To learn more about how low-income shoppers spend less for food despite facing higher prices, we obtained food-store purchase data that incorporate per-capita quantity and expenditure-measure equivalents (household measures adjusted for household size) across income levels.The Main Economizing PracticesThe resulting comparisons describe how individuals with different levels of income vary in their food-spending patterns. By using actual transaction data, detailed information about the product purchased (for example, price, product description, package size, and brand name) as well as the condition of purchase (promotion, coupon, or sale item) was obtained. From these, the average unit cost (per ounce, per pound) for each item was calculated. Low-income shoppers may use four primary economizing practices to reduce their food spending. First, they may purchase a greater proportion of discounted products. Second, they may purchase more private-label products (generic or store brand) versus brand products than higher-income shoppers buy. Third, they may take advantage of volume discounts by purchasing larger package sizes. Fourth, they may purchase a less-expensive food product within a product class. Although quality differences such as freshness, convenience and taste often contribute to prices differences, differences in nutritional quality are also evident.More Spending on Promotional ItemsThe use of promotions is measured by comparing the percentage of expenditures and quantities of each product purchased on promotion (manufacurers coupons, store coupons, store sales, and other promotions). For random-weight cheese, fruit, vegetables and meat in 1998, low-income households (less than $ 25,000 per yeA.Y B.N C.NG7.To keep the Earth out of warm, we can destroy the Methane with _.A.greenhouse gas B.sunlight C.water D.oxygen8.It has been said that the English and the Americans are two great people se
收藏 下载该资源
网站客服QQ:2055934822
金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号