2022年考博英语-华东政法大学考前拔高综合测试题（含答案带详解）1. 单选题VIII. International LawBefore the first substantive meeting, the Panel received an unsolicited amicus curiae brief from Humane Society International and American Universitys Washington College of Law, accompanied by a letter dated 6 May 2010.At the first substantive meeting, the United States requested the Panel to review and consider the submission in its deliberations, in light of the relevant and useful information it contained which it believed could assist the Panel in understanding the issues in this dispute. In addition, in its responses to the Panels questions, the United States referred to some of the information contained in the amicus curiae brief in support of its arguments. Mexico did not comment on the filing of the amicus curiae brief or on its content at the first substantive meeting.The Panel subsequently invited both parties to comment on certain information presented as an exhibit to the amicus curiae brief. In its response, Mexico observed that factual information submitted through an amicus curiae brief could not be properly treated as part of the record of this dispute. The United States responded that, although a panel is not required to consider information submitted by amici, it may consider such information as it sees fit. In particular, the United States noted that the Chairman of the Panel had invited the parties and third parties in this dispute to offer views in relation to the amicus curiae brief filed.The Panel informed the parties prior to the first meeting that: “Taking into account the determinations of the Appellate Body in US-Shrimp (WT/DS58/AB/R), the Panel considers that it has the discretionary authority either to accept and consider or to reject information and advice submitted to it, and it will accordingly treat this brief as it deems appropriate.”The Panel therefore considers that it has the authority to consider the information contained in the amicus curiae brief, and has done so to the extent that it deemed it relevant to the examination of the claim before it. Where the Panel considered the information presented in and the evidence attached to the amicus curiae brief relevant, it has sought the views of the parties in accordance with the requirements of due process. In addition, to the extent that one of the parties has cited the amicus curiae brief or cross-referenced to the exhibits presented with such brief in its reasoning or responses to questions, these elements form part of the submissions of that party in these proceedings and the Panel deems appropriate refer to such information in its findings.79. In the 1st sentence of the 2nd paragraph, there are 3 “it (its)” (underlined), these words, according to the context, represent the following in order respectively.80. Which of the following statement is NOT true?81. It can be inferred from the 4th paragraph that _.82. The Panel would deal with the amicus curiae brief in the following way except _.问题1选项A.the Panel, the brief, the United StatesB.the United States, the brief, the United StatesC.the Panel, the United States, the briefD.none of the above问题2选项A.The US welcomed the amicus curiae brief and thought it was helpful to the Panel.B.Mexico also welcomed the amicus curiae brief but thought factual information in the brief could not be treated as part of the record of the dispute.C.The panel invited the third parties to submit their opinion in relation to the amicus curiae brief filed.D.The Panel informed the parties its attitude towards amicus curiae brief prior to the first meeting.问题3选项A.the Panel considered that it had the discretionary authority to accept amicus curiae briefB.the Panel considered that it had the discretionary authority to reject amicus curiae briefC.the Panel considered the Appellate Bodys opinion regarding amicus curiae brief in US- Shrimp caseD.the Panel would treat the brief as it deemed appropriate问题4选项A.when the Panel deemed it relevant to the examination of the claim before it, the Panel would consider the information contained in the briefB.the Panel would seek the views of the parties regarding the information presented in and the evidence attached to the amicus curiae briefC.if one party cited the amicus curiae brief in its reasoning, these elements would form part of the submissions of that partyD.the Panel thought it was inappropriate to refer to such information in its findings【答案】第1题:A第2题:B第3题:D第4题:D【解析】79. 【试题答案】A【试题解析】词义推测题。根据题干定位到第二段第一句At the first substantive meeting, the United States requested the Panel to review and consider the submission in its deliberations, in light of the relevant and useful information it contained which it believed could assist the Panel in understanding the issues in this dispute.（在第一次实质性会议上，美国要求小组审查和审议其审议意见中提交的材料，因为它载有有关和有用的资料，它认为这些资料可以帮助小组了解这一争端中的问题）可知第一个its指