资源预览内容
第1页 / 共20页
第2页 / 共20页
第3页 / 共20页
第4页 / 共20页
第5页 / 共20页
第6页 / 共20页
第7页 / 共20页
第8页 / 共20页
第9页 / 共20页
第10页 / 共20页
亲,该文档总共20页,到这儿已超出免费预览范围,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述
2022年考博英语-中国农业科学院考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)1. 单选题He felt a repugnance for the city because it was heavily under the influence of foreigners, whom he considered to be corrupt and( ).问题1选项A.unscrupulousB.with principlesC.in principleD.out of principle【答案】A【解析】考查形容词词义辨析。A选项unscrupulous“寡廉鲜耻,不讲道德的”;B选项with principles“符合原则的”;C选项in principle“大体上,原则上”;D选项out of principle“背离原则”。根据题干,可知此处应当填入一个形容词,且含有贬义,因此推测A选项正确。句意:他对这座城市感到厌恶因为这城市受外国人影响太严重了,而他眼中的外国人是堕落而又。因此A选项正确。2. 不定项选择题A Washington-based think tank has been soliciting critiques of the just-released international assessment of the evidence on climate change, a move that prompted some academics and environmentalists to accuse the group of seeking to distort the latest evidence for global warming.Advocacy groups such as Greenpeace and the Public Interest Research Group questioned why the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) has offered $10,000 to academics willing to contribute to a book on climatechange policy, an overture that was first reported Friday in Londons Guardian newspaper.Greenpeace spokeswoman Jane Kochersperger, who noted that AEI has received funding from Exxon Mobil in recent years, said yesterday that the think tank “has clearly hit a new low when its throwing out cash awards under the rubric of reason to create confusion on the status of climate science. Americans are still suffering the impacts of Hurricane Katrina, and its clearly time for policymakers on both sides of the aisle to take substantive action on global warming and ignore Exxon Mobils disinformation campaign via climate skeptics.”AEI visiting scholar Kenneth Greenone of two researchers who has sought to commission the critiquessaid in an interview that his group is examining the policy debate on global warming, not the science.“Its completely policy-oriented,” said Green, adding that a third of the academics AEI solicited for the project are interested in participating. “Somebody wants to distort this.”In July 2006, Green and AEI resident scholar Steven F. Hayward both of whom have questioned the need for caps on emissions of carbon dioxide and other gasses linked to global warming started soliciting essays from academics on the then-upcoming report on global warming by the U.N. sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The surveys authors, who hail from more than 100 countries, said in their report Friday that they are at least 90 percent certain that human activity accounted for climate change over the past 50 years.“The purpose of the project is to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the IPCC process, especially as it bears on policy responses to climate change,” the two men wrote. “As with any large-scale consensus process, the IPCC is susceptible to self-selection bias in its personnel, resistant to reasonable criticism and dissent, and likely to have summary conclusions that are poorly supported by the analytical work of the complete Working Group reports.”At least two academics Texas A&M University atmospheric sciences professor Gerald North and Texas A&M climate researcher Steven Schroeder turned down AEIs offer because they feared their work would be politicized.Schroeder, who has worked with Green in the past and has questioned some aspects of traditional climate modeling, said in an interview that he did not think AEI would have skewed his results. But he added that he worried his contribution might have been published alongside “off-the-wall ideas” questioning the existence of global warming.“We worried our work could be misused even if we produced a reasonable report,” Schroeder said. “While any human endeavor can be criticized, the IPCC system greatly exceeds the cooperation, openness and scientific rigorousness of the process applied to any other problem area that has significant effects on society.”41. The word “commission” in the fourth paragraph can be best replaced by( ).42. Some academics and environmentalists accuse( )of seeking to distort the latest evidence of global warming.43. Advocacy groups include( ).44. Jane Kochersperger is( ).45. Kenneth Green believes( ).46. The best title for this article is( ).问题1选项A.calling the group together to do the jobB.separating the group from doing the jobC.committeeD.setting up a committee to tackle this issue问题2选项A.a Washington based think tankB.a solicitorC.an assessmentD.an assessment group问题3选项A.American Enterprise institute and the Public Institute Research GroupB.Greenpeace and American Enterprise InstituteC.Greenpeace Public Interest Research Group and American Enterprise InstituteD.Public Interest Research Group and Greenpeace问题4选项A.an employer of Exxon MobilB.a U.S. congresspersonC.a victim of Hurricane KatrinaD.a spokesperson for Greenpeace问题5选项A.there is a need to cap emissions of carbon dioxide
网站客服QQ:2055934822
金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号