2022年考博英语-广东工业大学考试题库（难点、易错点剖析）附答案有详解1. 单选题（ ）, 1 hardly think I would have recognized him.问题1选项A.Should his name not be mentionedB.Had someone not mentioned his nameC.If someone did not mention his nameD.If someone had mentioned his name【答案】B【解析】考查虚拟语气。由后半句的would have recognized 可知是与过去事实相反的虚拟语气，从句用had+动词过去分词。句意：如果那时没有提到他的名字，我想我几乎认不出他来了。只有B项符合句意。2. 单选题Everybody loves a fat pay rise. Yet pleasure at your own can vanish if you learn that a colleague has been given a bigger one. Indeed, if he has a reputation for slacking, you might even be outraged. Such behavior is regarded as “all too human”，with the underlying assumption that other animals would not be capable of this finely developed sense of grievance. But a study by Sarah Brosnan and Frans de Waal of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has just been published in Nature, suggests that it is all too monkey, as well.The researchers studied the behavior of female brown capuchin monkeys. They look cute. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food tardily. Above all, like their female human counterparts, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of “goods and services” than males.Such characteristics make them perfect candidates for Dr. Brosnans and Dr. de waals study. The researchers spent two years teaching their monkeys to exchange tokens for food. Normally, the monkeys were happy enough to exchange pieces of rock for slices of cucumber. However, when two monkeys were placed in separate but adjoining chambers, so that each could observe what the other was getting in return for its rock, their behavior became markedly different.In the world of capuchins grapes are luxury goods（and much preferable to cucumbers）. So when one monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her token, the second was reluctant to hand hers over for a mere piece of cucumber. And if one received a grape without having to provide her token in exchange at all, the other either tossed her own token at the researcher or out of the chamber, or refused to accept the slice of cucumber. Indeed, the mere presence of a grape in the other chamber（without an actual monkey to eat it）was enough to induce resentment in a female capuchin.The researches suggest that capuchin monkeys, like humans, are guided by social emotions. In the wild, they are a co-operative, group-living species. Such co-operation is likely to be stable only when each animal feels it is not being cheated. Feelings of righteous indignation, it seems, are not the preserve of people alone. Refusing a lesser reward completely makes these feelings abundantly clear to other members of the group. However, whether such a sense of fairness evolved independently in capuchins and humans, or whether it stems from the common ancestor that the species had 35 million years ago, is, as yet, an unanswered question.1. The author introduces his topic in the opening paragraph by（ ）.2. The statement “it is all too monkey”（Last line, paragraph 1）implies that（ ）.3. The researchers chose female capuchin monkeys for study probably because they are（ ）.4. The researchers found in their study that the monkeys（ ）.5. It can be inferred from the last paragraph that（ ）.问题1选项A.posing a contrastB.making a comparisonC.justifying an assumptionD.explaining a phenomenon问题2选项A.monkeys are also outraged by slack rivalsB.resenting unfairness is also monkeys natureC.monkeys, like humans, tend to be jealous of each otherD.no animals other than monkeys can develop such emotions问题3选项A.more generous than their male companionsB.nice in both appearance and temperamentC.more inclined to weigh what they getD.attentive to researchers instructions问题4选项A.prefer grapes to cucumbersB.can be taught to exchange thingsC.are unhappy when separated from othersD.will not be cooperative if feeling cheated问题5选项A.monkeys can be trained to develop social emotionsB.human indignation evolved from an uncertain sourceC.animals usually show their feelings openly as humans doD.cooperation among monkeys remains stable only in the wild【答案】第1题:B第2题:B第3题:C第4题:C第5题:B【解析】1.考查写作手法。第一段将人与猴子之间的相似性进行比较,说明人会将自己与其同类进行比较，而一项研究也表明猴子也存在这种现象。A项posing a contrast提出一个对比，但文章不止提出了对比，还进行了分析。B项making a comparison作对比，符合题意。contrast多用于不同事物之间的比较；而compare多用于类比，即同类事物之间的比较。C项“证明一个假设”，第一段说的是人与猴子的比较，而不是假设什么东西。D项“解释一种现象”与第一段不符。故B项正确。、2.判断推理题。 由于题目表面看上去是问一个词组的意思，实际上只有先理解“all too human太具人性化的”然后才能够理解“all too monkey太猴子化了”。A项“猴子也会被懒散的竞争对手激怒。”文章中开篇的时候只是说人会被懒散的竞争对手激怒，并没有说动物也会被懒散的竞争对手激怒，故A项错误。C项“猴子和人一样，也会彼此嫉妒。”这是最大的干扰项，本文的主题就是要告诉大家“猴子也痛恨不公平”，故该项与原文内容有区别。D项 “除了猴子没有动物能够培养出这样的感情。”从原文并不能推断出这个观点。故B项“猴子与人一样，也会憎恶不公平”。3.细节事实题。由第二段以及第三段一句话“The researchers studied the behavior of female brown capuchin monkeys. They look cute. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share thei