Hewlett-PackardSupplier Management ProcessReferenceRevision EQUALITY SURVEYRATING SHEET （品質檢驗表）SUBSYSTEM RATINGS（子系統）Supplier Name:（供應商名稱）Date:（時間）Survey Team Leader:（品質檢驗主任）(范圍)無系統明顯缺陷必須改進滿意特優加權加權總數20407085100SUBSYSTEMS (子系統)0214171861. Quality System Management（質量系統管理）0.22. Documentation（文件）0.13. Procurement( 取樣)0.14. Mfg. And Material Control （ 生產和原料控制）0.14. Final Acceptance（最終承認）0.16. Calibration（ 標度）0.17. Quality Information（ 質量資料）0.18. Statistical Process Control（統計程式控制）0.2SYSTEM RATING 86 - 100 Outstanding(極好) 71 - 85 Satisfactory（ 滿意）System Rating (系統級別) 41 - 70 Improvement Needed （必需改善） 21 - 40 Significant Deficiency（明顯的不良缺陷） 0 - 20 No System(無系統)Previous System Rating(以前的系統級別)(Date: 時間 )QUALITY SURVEY(品質調查)ELEMENT # 1: QUALITY MANAGEMENT（要素# 1:質量管理）FACTOR RATING ( R )（要素級別）Company: _（公司名稱）Date: _（日期）Surveyor: _(檢驗員)無系統明顯缺陷必須改進滿意極好可用要素點（0或4 點）得分No.Description012341.Are Quality Objectives and Responsibility clearly stated, widely distributed, and understood through the company.（品質目標和義務 觀念是否全面地深入公司的每一個職員，讓他們透徹地理解其內涵？）42.To what extent are Quality Objectives used to guide planning?（品質目標用來指導預防要達到什麼程度？）43.Do all support organizations understand their role in achieving Total Customer Satisfaction?（公司所有的支持部門是否意識到他們在能夠滿足客戶過程中所發揮的作用？）Supplier/（一口鉗子）44.Are the quality procedures and policies current and available at the point of application?品質程序和方針是否切實可行？45.Are continuous improvement principles understood by all levels of management?（可持續性改善品質原則是否被各平級管理部所理解？）46.To what extent does management solicit and accept feedback from the work force?（管理要求和生產車間工人的反饋如何？）47.Does a comprehensive training program exist?（是否有系統化品質培訓方案？）48.Are the quality and reliability goals aggressive relative to customer expectations and targeted at continuous improvement?（與客戶積極期望的 可信賴品質目標是否按目標進行可持續的改進?）49.How technically informed are the people who are responsible for promoting continuous improvement? ( 促進品質改進的品質人員的技能程度如何？)410.Does Management have a defect prevention attitude to achieve continuous quality improvement?（在可持續性品質改進中管理人員是否具有品質預防的理念？）4TOTAL AVAILABLE POINTS（可用要素得分點累計）40ELEMENT RATING （要素級別） = (TOT. SCORE / TOT. AVAIL. PTS.)（總得分/可用要素得分累計）QUALITY SURVEY（品質調研）ELEMENT # 2: DOCUMENTATION（要素# 2:文件）FACTOR RATING ( R )（要素級別）Company: _（公司名稱）Date: _（日期）Surveyor: _(檢驗員)無系統明顯缺陷必須改進滿意極好可用要素點（0或4點）得分No.Description（描述）012341.To what extent are manufacturing product, process, and configuration documents under issue control?（在品質系統控制中對產品，及其生產流程還有配置文件做何要求？）42.To what extent are preliminary and special product specs controlled?（在品質系統控制中對試產的和特殊品種的規格控制又做何要求？）43.How well does the system ensure that the most current customer specifications are available to the manufacturing personnel?（為確保目前的可用的客戶規格書品質系統又 如何要求我們的生產工人怎樣做才好呢？）44.To what extent does the system ensure that the most current material specifications are available to the procurement function?（系統為確保我們產品性能的正常發揮對來料要求做如何規定？）45.To what extent are incoming orders reviewed for revisions and issue changes?（系統對採購訂單的變更做何要求？）46.How well is conformance to customer specifications assured before an order is accepted?（在接單前與客戶的規格書要求 一致程度是否很好？）47.To what extent are critical characteristics classified?（系統對於臨界的產品品性做何要求？）48.To what extent are customers informed of changes made to products controlled by customer drawings or specifications?（對按照客戶的圖示和規格的產品有所 變更的品質系統做何要求？）49,Is there an effective internal deviation control procedure and are customer requested deviations documented and followed?（是否有完全相迥異的且客戶文件化的可遵守的內部控制程序？）410.Do new product development procedures exist and are they followed in the design process?（是否有可更新產品程序且它們遵守產品外觀流程？4TOTAL AVAI