考研考博-考博英语-中国人民解放军陆军装甲兵学院模拟考试题含答案1. 单选题While a full understanding of what causes the disease may be several years away, _ leading to successful treatment could come much sooner.问题1选项A.a distinctionB.a breakthroughC.an identificationD.an interpretation【答案】B【解析】【选项释义】A. a distinction差别，区别 B. a breakthrough重大进展，突破C. an identification鉴定，辨认 D. an interpretation理解，解释【考查点】名词辨析。【解题思路】根据while可知，这里是一个让步状语从句，意思是“尽管要完全了解这种疾病的病因可能还需要几年时间”，而主句提到“导致成功治疗的_可能会很快到来”，可推知空格处表示“突破性进展”，所以该题选择B项。【干扰项排除】A、C、D项不符合句意。【句意】虽然要完全了解这种疾病的病因可能还需要几年时间，但导致成功治疗的突破性进展可能会很快到来。2. 单选题When the farmers visited the city for the first time, they were _ by its complicated traffic system.问题1选项A.evokedB.bewilderedC.divertedD.undermined【答案】B【解析】【选项释义】A. evoked引起，唤起（感情、记忆或形象） B. bewildered使迷惑，使糊涂C. diverted使转向，转移（某人）的注意力 D. undermined逐渐削弱（信心、权威等），使逐步减少效力【考查点】动词辨析。【解题思路】根据句意“农民们第一次进城时，他们被城市复杂的交通系统_”可知，他们是对城市复杂的交通系统感到困惑，所以该题选择B项。【干扰项排除】A、C、D项不符合句意。【句意】农民们第一次进城时，对城市复杂的交通系统感到迷惑不解。3. 单选题Someone is ringing the doorbell. Go and see _.问题1选项A.who is heB.who it isC.who he isD.who is it【答案】C【解析】【选项释义】A. who is he他是谁 B. who it is它是谁C. who he is他是谁 D. who is it它是谁【考查点】宾语从句。【解题思路】分析句子可知，空格处为宾语从句，跟在动词go和see的后面，根据前一句“有人在按门铃”可知，宾语从句引导要用who，从句要用陈述语气，who指的是someone，所以要用代词he，该题选择C项正确。【干扰项排除】A、D项不是陈述语气；B项it不指人。【句意】有人在按门铃。去看看他是谁。4. 单选题The hero of the book, Charles, is a conventional nineteenth-century gentleman; the heroine Sarah, _ by her lover, is a “fallen woman”, whom Charles tries to help.问题1选项A.to be discardedB.to have been abandonedC.having cast awayD.having been deserted【答案】D【解析】【选项释义】A. to be discarded被抛弃 B. to have been abandoned被遗弃C. having cast away丢掉 D. having been deserted被抛弃【考查点】非谓语动词。【解题思路】分析句子结构可知，空格处为非谓语动词做定语修饰the heroine Sarah（女主人公莎拉），通过介词by可知，此处表示被动，结合选项可知是表示“抛弃”，desert强调“违背允诺、誓言或责任”违，尤其指“背叛、擅离职守”，所以D项符合。【干扰项排除】A项discard强调抛弃、丢弃无用的事物或永远放弃某个信念；B项abandon强调完全、永远地遗弃，尤其指遗弃以前负有责任的人或物；C项为主动语态，且cast away（丢掉）不符合句意。【句意】书中的主人公查尔斯是一位传统的19世纪绅士；被爱人抛弃的女主人公莎拉是一个“堕落的女人”，查尔斯试图帮助她。5. 不定项选择题No company likes to be told it is contributing to the moral decline of a nation. “Is this what you intended to accomplish with your careers?” Senator Robert Dole asked Time Warner executives last week. “You have sold your souls, but must you corrupt our nation and threaten our children as well?” At Time Warner, however, such questions are simply the latest manifestation of the soul-searching that has involved the company ever since the company was born in 1990. Its a self-examination that has, at various times, involved issues of responsibility, creative freedom and the corporate bottom line.At the core of this debate is the chairman Gerald Levin, 56, who took over for the late Steve Ross in 1992. On the financial front, Levin is under pressure to raise the stock price and reduce the companys mountainous debt, which will increase to S17.3 billion after two new cable deals close. He has promised to sell off some of the property and restructure the company, but investors are waiting impatiently.The flap over rap is not making like any easier for him. Levin has consistently defended the companys rap music on the grounds of expression. In 1992, when Time Warner was under fire for releasing Ice-Ts violent rap song Cop Killer, Levin described rap as a lawful expression of street culture, which deserves an outlet. “The test of any democratic society,” he wrote in a Wall Street Journal column, “lies not in how well it can control expression but in whether it gives freedom of thought and expression the widest possible latitude, however disputable or irritating the results may sometimes be. We wont retreat in the face of any threats.”Levin would not comment on the debate last week, but there were signs that the chairman was backing off his hard-line stand, at least to some extent. During the discussion of rock singing verses at last months stockholder meeting, Levin asserted that “music is not the cause of societys ills” and even cited his son, a teacher in the Bronx, New York, who uses rap to communicate with students. But he talked as well about the “balanced struggle” between creative freedom and social responsibility, and he announced that the company would launch a drive to develop standards for distribution and labeling of potentially objectionable music.The 15 member Time Warner board is generally supportive of Levin and his corporate strategy. But insiders say several of them have shown their concerns in this matter. “Some of us have known for many, many years that the freedoms under the First Amendment are not totally unlimited,” says Luce, “I think it is perhaps the case that some people associated with the company have only recently come to realize this.”1. Senator Robert Dole criticized Time Warner f