2022年考博英语-广东工业大学考前模拟强化练习题（附答案详解）1. 单选题The CIA chief noted last month, “There are a lot of things that Iran does that tends to（ ）terrorism, and they still are the leading state sponsor of terrorism in the world.”问题1选项A.fastenB.flatterC.fascinateD.facilitate【答案】D【解析】考查动词词义辨析。A选项fasten表示“使固定，集中于”；B选项flatter表示“奉承，谄媚”；C选项fascinate表示“使着迷，使神魂颠倒”；D选项facilitate表示“促进，帮助，使容易”。由后文提到的“they still are the leading state sponsor of terrorism in the world”可知，Iran仍然是世界上支持恐怖主义的主要国家，所以他们做了很多事帮助恐怖主义，为他们提供便利。因此，facilitate含义更符合句意，故本题正确答案为D选项。2. 单选题Social tensions among adult factions can be adjusted by politics, but adolescents and children have no such（ ）for resolving their conflict with the exclusive world of adults.问题1选项A.attitudeB.mechanismC.justificationD.opportunity【答案】B【解析】考查名词辨析。attitude态度，看法；mechanism机制，原理，途径；justification 理由，辩护。；opportunity机会。no such与前半句的politics对应，politics在句中属于解决问题的方法，故后半句用mechanism。答案B。句意：成人派系之间的社会紧张关系可以通过政治来调整，但是青少年和儿童没有这样的（ ）来解决他们与成人世界的冲突。、3. 单选题After a whole days heavy work，the old worker returned home,（ ）.问题1选项A.hungry and felt exhaustingB.hunger and exhaustedC.hungry and having been exhaustedD.hungry and exhausted【答案】D【解析】考查形容词作状语。题干的主语是the old worker,空格处填两个形容词来修饰主语。根据前一句“在一天的劳累工作之后”可知这个老工人是饥饿并且疲惫的。exhausting 使筋疲力尽的；exhausted疲惫的。故D项正确。句意：在经历一天的劳累工作后，这个老工人带着饥饿和疲惫回家了。4. 单选题Despite media reports that the plane was hijacked, experts were still investigating all possibilities as to what had caused MH370 to（ ）from its original flight path.问题1选项A.detachB.deviateC.differD.discharge【答案】B【解析】考查动词词义辨析。A选项detach表示“使分离，派遣”；B选项deviate表示“使偏离，越轨”；C选项differ表示“使不同，意见分歧”；D选项discharge表示“离开，放电，释放，撤销”。根据关键词“from its original flight path”可知，原文讲的是飞机偏离航线，因此deviate含义最符合原文句意，故本题正确答案为B选项。5. 单选题We eat our food with chopsticks and the Europeans（ ）knives and forks.问题1选项A.eat withB.do withC.usingD.with【答案】D【解析】考查省略用法。并列句中如果两个分句有重复处，后面重复部分常常省略。故D项正确。句意：我们用筷子吃东西，而欧洲人用刀和叉。6. 单选题In 2010, a federal judge shook Americas biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades - by 2005 some 20% of human genes were patented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation（BIO）, a trade group, assured members that this was just a preliminary step in a longer battle.On July 29th they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a womans risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it; and patents monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriads. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule is no less a product of nature. than are cotton fibers that have been separated from cotton seeds.Despite the appeals courts decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.As the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules - most are already patented or in the public domain. Firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drugs efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for connecting the dots, explains Hans Sauer, a lawyer for the BIO.Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents. Each meeting was packed.1. Paragraph 1 suggests that the biotech companies would like（ ）.2. The possible reason why genes are not patentable is that（ ）.3. Companies are eager to win patents for（ ）, according to Hans Sauer.4. Each meeting was packed（line4, para6）implies that（ ）.5. The authors attitude toward gene patenting is generally one of（ ）.问题1选项A.genes to be patentableB.the BIO to issue a warningC.their execut