The entire push for war against Afghanistan despite a total lack of evidence of a link between the Taliban government and Osamans international al-Queda movement that has agents in every Moslem country (Americans are being propagandized into thinking that the Taliban is Bin Ladens organization deliberate disinformation to prompt this war) the irrational placed emphasis on destroying the Taliban is being pushed by two men in the Defense Department with the strongest possible ties to the great investment banking houses of New York and London that launder a trillion dollars of illegal drug money each year (most of it from processed opium that comes out of Northern Afghanistan from the anti-Taliban drug lords who dominate there and who are favored by investment bank puppet institutions and political stooges.Richard Norman Perle, a Rockefeller mouthpiece from the Davids Rockefellers American Enterprise for Public Policy Research; and Assistant Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz a member since the late 1960s of the banking establishments shadow directors of the United States government, the Council on Foreign, Paul have both been making totally irrational demands for war to destroy the Taliban - irrational, that is, given one accepts the official interpretation of events and the official rationals and motivations, but which perfect sense from the standpoint of the globalist banking elites causing a war to protect the flow of opium that keeps them flush with drug lord invested capital, the high powered money which powers the international capital flows behind World-plundering globalization of finance capital.Nader, Buchanan and Chomsky have been filling the Internet with this analysis this morning. Here is populist Buchanans analysis:Whose War is This?By Patrick J. BuchananIn his resolve to hunt down and kill the Osama bin Laden terrorists he says committed the Sept. 11 massacres, President Bush has behind him a nation more unified than it has been since the days of Pearl Harbor. But now Bush has been put on notice that this war cannot end with the head of bin Laden and the overthrow of the Taliban.The shot across Bushs bow came in an Open Letter co-signed by 41 foreign-policy scholars, including William Bennet, Jcanc Kirkpatrick, the publisher of the Weekly Standard and the editor and chief of the New Republic essentially the entire neoconservative establishment.What must Bush do to retain their support? Target Hezbollah for destruction and retaliate against Syria and Iran if they refuse to cut all ties with to Hezbollah and move militarily to overthrow Iraqs Saddam Hussein. Failure to attack Iraq, the neocons warn Bush, will constitute an early and prehaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.Our purpose in writing is to assure you of our support as you do what must be done to lead the nation to victory in this fight, the letter ends.Implied is a threat to end support if Bush does not widen the war to include all of Israels enemies, or if he pursues the U.S.-Arab-Muslim coalition of Secretary of State Colin Powell. Among the signers is Richard Perle, chairman of Bushs own Defense Policy Board, a key advisory group.This letter represents one side of a brutal policy battle that has erupted in the capital: Is it to be Powelfs war or Perles war?The final decision Bush makes will be as historically crucial as Trumans decision to let MacArthur advance to the Yalu, and FDRs decision to hold up Eisenhowers armies and let Stalin take Berlin.How will the President conic down is unknown.In his address to Congress a week ago, Bush declared: From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.* The President seemed to be offering amnesty, or conditional absolution , to rogue states if they enlist in Americas war, now, and expel all terrorist cells.Even Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is signaling that what matters arc not where nations stood, but where they stand. On Sunday, he said on CBS: What we are looking at today is how are states going to behave going forward.And Powells coalition is coming together. Whether out of fear or opportunism, Libya, Syria, Iran and the Palestinian Authority have all denounced the atrocities of Sept. 11. Pakistan has joined the coalition. Sudan is cooperating.But calls for a wider war dominate the neoconservative media. The Weekly Standars opinion editor, David Tell, wants war not only on past sponsors of ten or, but alos on any group or government inclined to support or sustain others like them in the future.Bennet wants COngrewss to declare war on militant Islam, and overwhelming force used on state sponsors of terror such as Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Iran and even China. The Wall Street Journal wants strikes aimed at terrorist camps in Syria, Sudan, Libya and Algeria,