ISSUE:Recentlythereisadebateoverwhether.Somepeopleassert that.,whileotherpeoplebelievethatAsamatteroffact,the issueofwhether.isacomplexandcontroversialone.Different peopleholddifferentviewsduetotheirdistinctbackgrounds.Therefore,thereisnotauniversalanswertothisquestion,andwhetheronechoicetakesprecedenceovertheothermayquitedependonthespecificsituation.Thedecision,nevertheless,isnotaneasyonetomake.Actually,thefinaljudgmentshouldrelyonacase-by-caseanalysis.AsfarasIamconcerned,however,Iagreethat.,anddonotagreethat.Myviewcanbegreatly substantiatedbythefollowingdiscussions.ThefirstargumentthatcanbepresentedtodevelopmypositionisthatAgoodexamplemaybefoundinthecasethatUnderthis circumstance,itisobviousthat. Inaddition,thereisanotherreasonformetochoosethisstatement.Thereasonisnotfartoseek.Toillustrate,letus considerthatHence,anotherequallyimportantaspectisthat. Admittedly,itmaybetruethat.insomeconditions.However,this alonedoesnotconstituteasufficientsupporttoclaimthat.,Actually,thesecasesarerareandthereforearetoospecificand tooweaktostrengthentheviewthatWhentheadvantagesand disadvantagesofxandyarecarefullyexamined,themoststrikingconclusionisobviousthat Tosumup,duetotheabovementionedreasons,whichsometimescorrelatewitheachothertogenerateanintegratewholeandthusbecomemoreconvincingthananysingleoneofthem,wemaybecomfortabletosaythat.,because. ARGUMENTInthisargument,theauthorconcludesthatTosupporthis conclusion,theauthorpointsoutthat.Inaddition,theauthor reasonsthatFurthermore,healsoassumesthat.Atfirst glance,theauthorsargumentappearstobesomehowappealing,while acloseexaminationwillrevealhowgroundlessitis.Wedonothavetolookveryfartoseetheinvalidityofthisargument.Thisargumentisproblematicforthefollowingreasons.Inthefirstplace,thisargumentrestsonagratuitousassumptionthat.Theauthorunfairlyassumesthat.However,theassumption isquestionablebecausetheauthorprovidesnoevidencetosupportthisargument.Thearguerfailstotakeintoaccountotherfactsthatmightcontributetotheresultthat.Itislikelythat, .;itisalsolikelythatAnyofthese scenarios,iftrue,wouldshowthat.(72) Therefore,thisargumentisunwarrantedwithoutrulingoutsuchpossibility.Inthesecondplace,theargumentcommitsalogicfallacyof“after thisandthereforebecauseofthis”.Innocasecanthemerefact thatbecitedasevidencetosupporttheassumptionthatthereisa causal-effectrelationshipbetweenAandB.Moreover,thatjustbecauseBcanbestatisticallycorrelatedwithAdoesnotnecessarilymeanthatAisthecauseofB.Infact,theauthorhasobviouslyneglectedthepossibilityofotheralternativefactssuchas,ormaycontributetoacertainextenttoB.Itmaybeonlya coincidencethat.Unlesstheauthorcanruleoutotherfactors relevantto,thisassumptioninquestioncannotbeaccepted. Inthethirdplace,theevidencethattheauthorprovidesisinsufficienttosupporttheconclusiondrawnfromit.Oneexampleisrarelysufficienttoestablishageneralconclusion.UnlessthearguercanshowthatA1isrepresentativeofallA,theconclusionthatBiscompletelyunwarranted.Infact,infaceofsuchlimited evidence,itisfallacioustodrawanyconclusionatall.Inthefourthplace,theargumenthasalsocommittedafalseanalogyfallacy.TheargumentrestsontheassumptionthatAisanalogoustoBinallrespects,andtheauthorassumeswithoutjustificationthatallthingsareequal,andthatthebackgroundconditionshaveremainedthesameatdifferenttimesoratdifferentlocations.Thereis,however,noguaranteethatthisisthecase.Nordoestheauthorciteanyevidencetosupportthisassumption.Lackingthisassumption,theconclusionthatisentirelyunfounded.Infact,it ishighlydoubtfulthatthefactsdrawnfromBareapplicabletoA.DifferencesbetweenAandBclearlyoutweightthesimilarities,thusmakingtheanalogyhighlylessthanvalid.Forexample,A.,however,B.Thus,itislikelymuchmoredifficultforBtodo.Inaddition,theconclusionunjustifiablyreliesonthepollwhilethevalidityofthesurveyitselfisdoubtful.Thepollcitedbytheauthoristoovaguetobeinformative.Theclaimdoesnotindicatewho,when,howandbywhomthesurveyisconducted,neitherdoesitmentionwhatisthesamplesize,orhowthesamplesareselected.Un